Links for Thursday April 26th 2012

  • Dead Air
    Dusting off an old tumblr, now using it mostly just to reblog things that catch my eye. Almost certainly gong to have more stuff on their than on Black Ink, if you can about that sort of thing. Black Ink is (mostly) for things I want to comment on, or think that other people might find interesting or useful. Dead Air is for stuff I just don't want to forget. You may or may not find it interesting.
  • Your Summer Beach Reading List for 2012
    There's a lot in here on my must-get-round-to list. Assuming I can get them day-and-date digital. And ideally DRM free. :)
  • The Verge at work: sync your text everywhere, never lose an idea again | The Verge
    I need to make a couple of tweak to my note taking workflow, but this article is a good pointer for where I've been going wrong with getting simplenote and dropbox to play together.
  • AeroPress “Ritual” on Vimeo
    I adore my aeropress. Anyone who likes coffee and does not have one at home is missing out.

Fragments

  1. Got tagged in a twitter discussion between friends while I was asleep last night – always a weird thing to wake up to, as I sort of feel like the discussion as passed me by, and it’s not appropriate to response. The vague context for the tagging was something about how I believe all corporations are evil. The comment wasn’t meant seriously, but it did start me thinking. Must try and find the time to write up something coherent on the subject at some point.
  2. Saw a book review on-line today, for a YA book called Fair Coin. Thought “that sounds interesting, I should read that” and went to try and buy it there and then. There doesn’t appear to be a digital edition available. There’s a lost sale, right there. And while two years ago, confronted with the same thing, I’d have shrugged and moved on (and OK, that’s actually what I’m doing now, I’m hardly weeping blood about this), today this feels like publisher incompetence. There is no excuse for not having day-and-date ebook editions available any more. Two years ago, sure, the contracts for the books being published then may not have included digital rights, or the publisher may simply not have gotten it’s digital distribution deals in place. But what’s the excuse today?
  3. I really like this “distraction free” mode that’s baked into wordpress now. How long has that been there?
  4. Contemplating a very severe book purge. Anyone out there interested in acquiring complete TPB runs of Preacher, Transmet, Invisibles, etc? I haven’t decided for sure one way or the other, I’m just wondering how easy they’d be to give away? (Other than to the charity shop, of course.) I sort of suspect that most folk I know who’d be interested already own them.

Links for Wednesday April 18th 2012

  • CMAP #2: How Books Are Made – Charlie’s Diary
    I have had a few conversations recently with people who have kvetched about having to pay the same price for an ebook as they do for the paperback, and I have wished that I was able to easily find this post to point them at. Short version: the cost of your paperback book is *not* a materials cost. Physical production, shipping and distribution account for around a quid of the price. The other six of seven quid is labour, and there's a lot more labour goes in that you might think, and most of it isn't the author's.
  • Twitter’s “Innovator’s Patent Agreement” – Marco.org
    No, it looks like other people have come to the same conclusions.
  • Twitter Blog: Introducing the Innovator’s Patent Agreement
    This is quite a good idea, although one might quibble over what "only used defensively" means – it's possible that I'm misunderstanding the legalese, but it looks to me that any company who has filed a patent infringement suit for any reason in the last ten years (and who might be infringing, obviously) would be fair game. Which in turn means that this is meaningless, and will be just as innovation-stifling in practice as any current agreement. But I await being told that I've misunderstood.
  • Paul Woods – Life on the Northern Line
    This made me smile this morning.

Links for Friday April 13th 2012

  • Just how big are porn sites? | ExtremeTech
    YouPorn apparently accounts for around 2% of the web's traffic (by volume) per day. Personally, I'm interested to see that they're using a lot of the obvious technologies, rather than anything really ultra-custom.
  • Rogers’ “Cybersecurity” Bill Is Broad Enough to Use Against WikiLeaks and The Pirate Bay | Electronic Frontier Foundation
    Americans! Are you aware of CISPA? Here are the facts: it is not a replacement for SOPA. It is however, badly drafted enough that it could very likely be similar in effect. Please write to your representatives, and make the point that while you don't necessarily oppose the aims of CISPA (many of them are actually quite sensible), the problem is that that bill as currently drafted is absolutely as bad as SOPA was. Seriously: if you got up in arms about SOPA, you need to write to them about the current draft of CISPA.

Links for Thursday April 12th 2012

  • iTunes: Time to right the syncing ship | Macworld
    "When it comes to hardware, Apple is bold in replacing popular old products with something new that’s different, but better. It’s time for the company to do the same with iTunes." Time, and more than time. I want a lightweight media library manager, a lightweight store and a lightweight sync management tool. iTunes has become slow and painful to use.
  • ANU Quantum Random Number Server
    An actual random number generator! Really random numbers. That's quite exciting. The next time I need a cryptographic salt, I shall be coming here.
  • Space Jam
    Do you remember what the promotional websites for movies used to look like? Here's one from 1995!
  • Why the New Aesthetic isn’t about 8bit retro, the Robot Readable World, computer vision and pirates |
    If you've been wondering why the New Aesthetic looks like 30 year old computer graphics (or if you haven't heard the term, but have wondered why half the fashion industry appears to have fallen down a pixelated 80s hole) then here is one possible answer. Short version: what computers can see and understand (in realtime) now is at about the level of 30 year old graphics. Where it gets interesting is where it talks about what we can extrapolate this to mean for machine vision over the next decade or so.