Design 2.0

Web 2.0 isn’t even properly here yet, and already I’m bored of the design style. I mean, I know that design goes in trends, and by late 2006, all the new launching stuff will look different, but I’m now heartily sick of sites with a white/cream background, and then pale blue, green and orangeused as colour indicators.

I’m sick of titles being in a slightly oversized blue font. Actually, I’m just sick of everything being slightly oversized. I’m sick of tag clouds, even though I know they’re here to stay. I’m sick of form elements that turn pastel yellow on selection.

One of the things I like about the web is the infinite variations on design, but thanks to the cleverness of a very few sites (Flickr and the 37 signals family of tools, it seems like everyone with a bit of Ajax-enabled software is using the same bloody colours all the damn time. Can we have some web 2.0 things that look different, please?

This entry was originally published at my workblog.

Note to self:

And also to flatmates and anyone else that it might be useful for (Londoners, really).

I have been pointed in the direction of Firezza as a basically fucking excellent delivery pizza place.

Certainly the toppings sound good, but most importantly: a) you can order on-line, and b) by the meter. I mean, come on, who hasn’t wanted to order up a couple of meters of pizza at some point?

I’m Going To Take Revenge

Specifically, I am going to exact horrible and bloody vengance on arachne and budgie_uk.

The former for saying “Oi, you, Nanowrimo”, and the latter for having been doing his (bloody good) fast fictions for the last horrifying length of time.

See, I have no intention of writing a novel next month. I’m not mad, after all, and there’s no way I could write a novel.

But produce 50,000 words in a month?

I might manage that. And if I work really hard, it might just tie in to the whole LJ as art-stunt thing I’ve been thinking about.

So: you’ve got until October the 23rd to tell me what you want me to write. (I want a week to think and plan). Give me words, phrases, titles, topics, forms, photos, names, places, dates and faces. Anything you want. I make no promises I’ll use anything you mention. I make no promises that I’ll use anything you mention in the way you intend it to be used. But you get to kick in to what I’m doing, at least at the start. Feel free to point other people in the direction of this post as well – I don’t care if I know them or not, I want as much crap as possible in the comments here so that I’ve got a broad scratchboard to choose from.

And come December the 1st, I’ll see what I’ve got.

The comments on this are screened, so that no-one but you and me will know what you said or suggested. I don’t want to spoil the surprise, if it turns out there is one.

Links For 2005-10-05

  • Useful tutorial on one company’s approach to maknig sure that AJAX enabled sites degrade gracefully. I’m almost at the point of sacking off support for non XMLHttpRequest clients, but still, it bears thinking about.

  • I’ve got a fair amount of sympathy with this, since I’ve grown up doing webdev rather than appdev – I don’t like putting the business logic elements on the database, I’d rather keep them in the scripting languauge which is generally higher-level and much better suited to complex logic.

This entry was originally published at my workblog.

Time saver…

I’ve been wanting to switch to a better format for my linkdump posts. Specifically, I want to make better use of del.icio.us to manage my bookmarking, and they’ve now got a post-to-blog feature. There’s a how-to guide here.

This entry was originally published at my workblog.

LJ Art

Wow, that colourquiz thing everyone’s doing makes me sound like a self-centered, neurotic mentalist. So, in keeping with my general policy of only being one of those three things at a time, I am not posting the details of me results.

Instead, I am going to tell you a story.

Four score and seventy years ago… was rather a lot before I was born. So we’ll skip over the intervening years and leap right to 1998, when I was working alone in a room that had no windows, but compensated by having a really bloody impressive fire extinguishing system. (Seriously: in the event of fire, I had 20 seconds to leave the room before it sealed itself and flooded with some kind of toxic gas. Happily, there were no fires.)

I spent quite a lot of time in that job basically using the web to teach myself all sorts of things, mostly either technical or about writing. Sites like Fray were a big influence on my thinking about the web at the time, and while I don’t read Fray regularly any more, it remains one of my touchstones for thinking about what makes a good website.

(Incidentally, I lied – I’m not telling you a story. Make up your own story, and pretend I told it to you. Pretend it had cyborg ninja mad scientists in it. It was probably quite good.)

Fray, of course, was one of the earliest social network sites. After every story, there’s a “share your experiences” bit (hell, if you dig around, you can probably turn a few of my responses up) and after a while, you started to notice the same names recurring, at least on the more interesting responses. And it had some of the “wow, that’s a really intimate secret they’re sharing” value of postsecret or even group hug (before it became a weird kind of oneupmanship with so much obvious fiction) do.

I’m reminded of this, because I’ve been listening to Alan Moore today, and the line in Snakes and Ladders “Seeing Art we recognise a thought we had but could not utter, are made less alone” reminded me of something I’ve been meaning to talk about in relation to the web, and specifically LJ for a while.

Only, as with every time I set out to do it, I find myself stuttering out. There’s something in my head about the idea of social networks as Art, and it’s trapped in there. I can’t seem to find the clear language to express it. I know that LJ is not, of itself Art. (Except in that computer code may or may not be art.) And most people’s LJs aren’t Art. But I do wonder about the idea of keeping an LJ as an art experiment. Not, you understand, a place to put fiction or any other made-up content. Fiction is not LJ specific. If we accept that the point of an LJ is, as with a private journal, to record the real, true things that happen as part of life, then surely it must be possible to make keeping an LJ into Art.

People have done it with websites, up to a point. Jason Kottke runs his blog as a full time career. I’m not saying that what he does is definitely Art, but y’know, it’s a creative, communicative, endeavour, so it’s got to be at least most of the way there.

But I know from experience – there’s a massive difference between keeping a weblog and an LJ. The social context is everything. The secret of LJ’s success is the word “Friends”.

So how would one go about keeping an LJ that was Art?

God, the shit that rattles around in my head.