Links for Monday January 24th 2011

  • Lost Bomber – Techbelly
    Mentally link this with the story of the woman the other week who was looking to put her disabled daughter into care, because she couldn't cope with the cuts. Futher thoughts: anecdote != data, but anecdote is useful to understand and connect with data.
  • Ben Bashford – Notebook of Things – Emoticomp
    Interesting idea to bear in mind when designing apps/systems – how to give it an emotional face, that it is consistent, and ideally, compelling.

8 Rules For Writing Short Fiction

Kurt Vonnegut’s 8 rules for writing short fiction (as listed in Bagombo Snuff Box: Uncollected Short Fiction) were:

  1. Use the time of a total stranger in such a way that he or she will not feel the time was wasted.
  2. Give the reader at least one character he or she can root for.
  3. Every character should want something, even if it is only a glass of water.
  4. Every sentence must do one of two things—reveal character or advance the action.
  5. Start as close to the end as possible.
  6. Be a Sadist. No matter how sweet and innocent your leading characters, make awful things happen to them—in order that the reader may see what they are made of.
  7. Write to please just one person. If you open a window and make love to the world, so to speak, your story will get pneumonia.
  8. Give your readers as much information as possible as soon as possible. To hell with suspense. Readers should have such complete understanding of what is going on, where and why, that they could finish the story themselves, should cockroaches eat the last few pages.

Were this one of those newfangled blogging systems that the kids all use, this would be listed as a “reblog” from Matt Webb, who has returned to blogging at Interconnected.org, which is good news. I’m not just linking to Mr Webb’s post, because I want to fix these rules firmly in my memory, and in order to be certain that I can find them myself at a later date, unimpeded by the vagaries of the intertubenets.

Links for Monday January 17th 2011

  • DeDRM AppleScript for Mac OS X 10.5, 10.6 « Apprentice Alf’s Blog
    I would not, of course, ever think of doing such a thing myself, in order to read my legitimately purchased ebooks on whatever device I wished.
  • Stupid legal threat of the young century – Boing Boing
    I'm sure loads of people will have done something like this, and you're bound to have seen the link, but essentially, lawyers for a website called Academic Advantage are sending websites that contain the words "academic" "advantage" and "scam" cease and desist letters claiming "There is absolutely no helpful reason for the website to have the words 'Academic,' 'Advantage' and 'Scam'". I disagree. There's a very helpful purpose – letting people know when the lawyers they retain engage in legal bullying that is completely groundless, and bring their client's name into disrepute.
  • Top Ten Typefaces Used by Book Design Winners | The FontFeed
    Just in case I ever need to to design an award winning book. Or something. Oh, just go look at the lovely fonts, will you?

Links for Friday January 14th 2011

  • Confused by Constellations? Find out about your new star sign!
    You may have seen reports on the internet about some sort of change to star signs caused by some kind of science, and you may be wondering what this means for your horoscope. Because I am a basically helpful person, I have put together this site, to help people who are confused by the whole thing. Please spread this link far and wide, as I would hate for people to be confused by astrology.

Links for Thursday January 13th 2011

  • A List Apart: Articles: A Simpler Page
    Discussion of laying out text for ipads (or similar) on the web, and a library to to the rendering. Particularly like the three modes – bed, knee and breakfast pretty neatly describe all the ways I use my device.
  • Come out of your comfort zone, disability living allowance cuts are relevant to all | Society | guardian.co.uk
    An excellent article on the cuts to DLA. Cannot quite believe that even this government of utter shits would essentially say "one in five people who have previously been assessed as needing help now won't get it". And yet they are. There's no suggestion that the previous tests were flawed. There's no (credible) suggestion that fully one in five of disabled people are OK, really, and just scrounging. They're hiding behind "we can't afford it". Which makes my blood boil. Surely, even in a time of national austerity, the one thing we should bend over backwards to afford, the one thing we should scrap all manner of other things to pay for, is caring for the most vulnerable members of our society.