Bookmarks for January 31, 2014

  • 15 Ways To Improve London’s Train Network | Londonist
    I liked this. A dozen or so usability improvements to the map and sinage, and a few other idea that make a suprising amount of sense, like reopening York Road.
    Tags: london, tube
  • The 2014 London "Coffee Stops' Map
    Tube map, listing the best coffee to be had near each stop. I take issue with a few of their choices, and their definition of "near" is a bit, er, different (their choice for Wimbldon, for example, is a 15 min walk up a steep hill to a place that is often *very* busy, which is more than I would want to both with if I'm just in town and want a quick coffee) but still: handy nonetheless.
    Tags: london, map, coffee

Bookmarks for December 20, 2013

Bookmarks for May 24, 2012

  • Kosmograd: Olympics Brand Exclusion Zone
    If I know anyone who lives in these zones (and I suspect I do) I *strongly* encourage you to buy competitor products, and leave them prominently in your windows. And, indeed, to pass this idea on. It would be *lovely* if the streets in these areas were plastered with the logos of competing brands – not as paid for advertising, but just as spontaneous citizen reclamation of the space that belongs to them, not to advertisers and marketers.

Bookmarks for April 18, 2012

  • CMAP #2: How Books Are Made – Charlie's Diary
    I have had a few conversations recently with people who have kvetched about having to pay the same price for an ebook as they do for the paperback, and I have wished that I was able to easily find this post to point them at. Short version: the cost of your paperback book is *not* a materials cost. Physical production, shipping and distribution account for around a quid of the price. The other six of seven quid is labour, and there's a lot more labour goes in that you might think, and most of it isn't the author's.
  • Twitter’s “Innovator’s Patent Agreement” – Marco.org
    No, it looks like other people have come to the same conclusions.
  • Twitter Blog: Introducing the Innovator's Patent Agreement
    This is quite a good idea, although one might quibble over what "only used defensively" means – it's possible that I'm misunderstanding the legalese, but it looks to me that any company who has filed a patent infringement suit for any reason in the last ten years (and who might be infringing, obviously) would be fair game. Which in turn means that this is meaningless, and will be just as innovation-stifling in practice as any current agreement. But I await being told that I've misunderstood.
  • Paul Woods – Life on the Northern Line
    This made me smile this morning.

Bookmarks for April 2, 2012